Meaning and purpose of anointing/Accusation against God's elect and judgment of false doctrines concerning "unholy" alliances by divorcees

The Church Yesterday and Today

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

The Church Yesterday

The Church Today

1.  Only believers were baptized. Babies are sprinkled.
2.  The dunamis of the Spirit was the primary requisite for ministry. A degree from seminary is the basic qualification.
3.  Leaders were selected by prayer and fasting. Leaders were elected by canvassing and bribing.
4.  Even the deacons had to be full of the Spirit. Some pastors are not even born of the Spirit.
5.  The apostles refused to leave prayer and preaching. Pastors and preachers cleave to administration and business matters.
6.  They had little gold but lot of glory. We have lot of gold but little glory.
7.  Money was at the apostles' feet. Money is in the pastor's fist.
8.  They shared their own property. We swindle the church's property.
9.   Hypocrisy was judged instantly. Hypocrisy jingles in the pulpit and pew.
10. They witnessed to the world. We simply witness the world.
11. They turned the world upside down. We tour the world up and down
12. When they were persecuted, they resorted to prayer. When there is problem, we run to the police.
13. They sang everywhere the Easter message. We sink everything in Christmas merry-making.
14. Miracles attested their message. They had "acts" on the streets. The media advertise our meetings. We just act on the stage.
15. The ministers had no titles or special dresses, but the demons trembled before them. We have numerous titles and sacred robes, but the devils trifle with us.
16. They released their best ministers for missionary work We retain the best and send forth the rest.
17. They had no building projects. The Church was mobile. We specialize in buildings. We are static.
18. They were multiplying. We are dividing.
19. All believers were soul-winners. Evangelism was their heartbeat. The pastor is all in all. His heart beats fast if any member becomes active in evangelism.
20. They left Jerusalem and spent all to reach the end of the earth. We save all we can to somehow make a trip to Jerusalem.

The above was written by Bro. R. Stanley, Blessing Youth Mission,  a pioneer mission leader in India who has a heart for revival and evangelism in India.

Meaning and purpose of anointing

The word "anointing" simply means "refreshment after bathing".  In the Old Testament, it has also been used in the religious sense of consecrating some thing for God. In the New Testament, it has been used in the context of anointing with the Holy Spirit.  Jesus is depicted in the New Testament as the "Anointed One" meaning "Christ".

Two Purposes in Old Testament:

There are at least two purposes for anointing in the Old Testament.  One is consecration and the other is coronation.

(i) Consecration: Jacob anointed a stone pillar (Gen.28:18).  This is the first anointing mentioned in the Bible.  He did it either to consecrate or for a memory. He did this before 'law' was given.

Moses also did anoint the things to consecrate for use in the holy tabernacle. He did the anointing with the "oil of Holy ointment" and not with the Holy Spirit (Ex.30:23-26).

(ii) Coronation:  In the Old Testament, persons were anointed with oil to be set apart as kings and priests. The anointing of oil was the symbol of endowment of the Spirit of God.

Anointing of the Holy Spirit in New Testament

The next subject we have to understand is the anointing of the Holy Spirit.  Before studying this subject, let us understand a few truths about the "Holy Spirit".

Holy Spirit is the Third Person in the Trinity.  He is a Person, and not an abstract power. He took active part in creation at the time of creation by God and today He takes active part in new creation/new birth. Jesus Christ was conceived in virgin Mary of the Holy Spirit (Matt.1:20). The Holy Spirit descended from the Heaven like a dove and lighted upon Him (Matt.3:17). Jesus Christ went on doing good by the Holy Spirit.  Under the New Covenant, the Holy spirit was sent to us on the day of Pentecost and the 120 disciples who were gathered in the Upper Room were anointed with the Holy Spirit for witnessing and service. Similarly, we are anointed with the Holy Spirit for witnessing and service (ministry). The same Holy Spirit who raised Jesus from the dead is dwelling in us (Rom.8:11).  In short, the Holy Spirit is a Person who creates and gives life. 

Lord Jesus was known as Anointed One.  The Holy Spirit dwelt in Him.  In Him dwelt all the fullness of the Godhead bodily (Col.2:9). A believer is said to be filled with the Holy Spirit, when the Holy Spirit indwells in Him.  The Holy Spirit takes abode in the heart of the believer on his/her rebirth. The believer is said to be anointed with the Holy Spirit, when the Holy Spirit later anoints him/her for a ministry. Anointing of the Holy Spirit means "Indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit for witnessing and ministry".  Under the Old Covenant, the kings and priests were anointed with oil for ministry. In a similar manner, we are anointed with the Holy Spirit for witnessing and ministry.

Difference between Holy Spirit and evil spirits

Evil spirits  work through mediums which can be non-living things or subhuman beings such as animals, birds, etc.  But the Holy Spirit work through the saints with perfect conscience and mind.

Some questions answered:

Question 1:  Can we anoint car, dollar, etc.?

Answer: No. 

Lord Jesus did not anoint any non-living things with the Holy Spirit.  The apostles also did not anoint any non-living things. They did not teach us to do so. Neither did they teach us to pray for anointing of any non-living thing with the Holy Spirit. 

It is a false doctrine. It is like an act of heathens. Heathens think and believe gods or evil spirits dwell in non-living things and in the nature. But the Bible teaches us that the Living God has revealed Himself in the nature and that He does not dwell in the nature.

There is no instance mentioned in the Bible about the anointing of non-living things by the Holy Spirit.

Anointing of car is unscriptural. If it is argued that the anointing of a car with the Holy Spirit would prevent the car from breakdown or accident, Paul could have anointed the ship in which he traveled so that it might not sink. We can very well pray for the anointing of all cots in our hospitals so that no patient may die.  All this is unscriptural. of course, we can pray for God's blessings upon our cars and for our protection from accidents or breakdowns.

Question No.2: Were the bones of Elisa, the hand kerchief of Paul, the apostle and the shadow of Peter, the apostle anointed with the Holy Spirit?

Answer: No.  It is true that the dead body who was put in the tomb of Elisa revived and stood on his feet when it touched the  bones of Elisa.(2 Kings 13:20-21). It is not written that the dead bones of Elisa were further used for reviving the other dead bodies. God did a special miracle to demonstrate the importance of the prophetic ministry of Elisa to the people who lived at that particular point of time.  It is not a fact that the hand kerchief of Paul was anointed by the Holy Spirit.  However, we can say that the blessing of the Lord was upon the kerchief of Paul and upon the shadow of Peter.

(Job Anbalagan)

Accusation against God's elect and judgment of false doctrines

Accusation against God's elect

At the outset, the term "accusation" is to be clearly understood from legal and scriptural points of view.  The motive of a person making an accusation is to be kept in mind.  If a person, with the ulterior motive of harming the reputation of another or causing embarrassment to another out of jealousy, ill-feeling or personal prejudices, finds fault with the latter, his action may be considered as an act of accusation.

In legal terminology, an accusation is brought against an accused person by an aggrieved person.  Until and unless the charges are proved through evidence, the accused would not be pronounced guilty by the judge.  Every aggrieved person or an advocate on his behalf has a legal right to bring an accusation before an earthly judge.  Scripturally speaking, the book of Moses teaches us clearly on the subject.  According to the New Testament doctrines, such an accusation should not be railing or intended to judge a fellow brother or sister in Christ. The Word of God teaches that a "railing accusation" should not be brought (2 Pet.2:11 and Jude 9).  The term "railing" means "using vigorously or mockingly a reproachful language".

Paul in his letter to Timothy (I Tim.5:19), based on Duet.19:15, writes, "Listen to no accusation preferred against an elder except it be confirmed by the testimony of two or three witnesses".  When a charge is laid "against an elder", it should be confirmed by the mouth of two or three witnesses. No doubt, the divine Advocate will appear before the Father on behalf of the accused elder if he has since confessed his sins and got the same cleansed by the precious Blood of Jesus (I John 1:8-10 & 2:1).  In this context, it would be appropriate to read what Paul has said in Rom.8:33-34 - "Who can lay a charge against God's elect...?"

Admonition of those who sin

Paul exhorts the young Timothy to "rebuke and admonish" them including the elder who are found guilty, and who persist in sin "in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus and of the elect angels - "thou observe these things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality...." (I Tim.5:20-21).

Open rebuke is better than secret love (Pro.27:5). David says in Psalm 141:5, "Let the righteous smite me; it shall be a kindness and let him reprove me; it shall be an excellent oil, which shall not break my head; for yet my prayer also shall be in their calamities".  In 2 Tim.4:2, Paul charges Timothy before God and Christ to "reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long-suffering and doctrine".

If an elder or a servant of God who has committed a sin and persists in such sin without repentance, the younger generations like Timothy have a right to bring an accusation against that elder through the mouth of witnesses and, if the charges are proved, to "rebuke and admonish" the elder concerned "before all" so that "others also may fear".

Judgment of false doctrines

A false doctrine which strikes at the very roots of Christian faith or the basic tenets of the New Testament is very pernicious.  It deserves to be exposed and condemned by all because those influenced by such false doctrines are made to forsake "the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam...." (2 Pet.2:15).  According to Rev.2:14, the false doctrines likened to "the doctrine of Balaam" casts a stumbling bloc before the children of God.  Accordingly, if an elder or a servant of God preaches a false doctrine which militates against the very foundation of the Christian edifice built on the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ being the Chief Corner Stone, every child of God has a right to warn the elder concerned against such a false and pernicious doctrine. In the West, the ministers of God preach a false doctrine justifying marriage of divorced persons during the life-time of their spouses which is an abomination in the sight of God.  This false doctrine has brought many people to the brink of the hell fire. Please read the Biblical doctrines concerning marriage and divorce.

The truth, the two-edged sword of the Spirit, should be upheld by all.  We are to contend for, and not to compromise the truth.  "Now just as Jannes and Jambras were hostile to and resisted Moses, so these men also are hostile to and oppose THE TRUTH.  They have depraved and distorted minds, and are reprobate and counterfeit and to be rejected as far as the faith is concerned" (2 Tim.3:8 - Amplified).

The Truth under the New Testament is compared to the Moses of the Old Testament. No servant of God under the New Covenant is supposed to take the place of Moses, and to claim immunity or protection from the Word after preaching a false and pernicious doctrine. The personality of Moses matters under the Old Testament but what matters under the New Covenant is not any human personality but the Personality of Christ Jesus which is revealed through the multi-membered Body, the Church.  The Truth is more precious and important than any human personality under the New Testament.

No New Testament believer can take shelter behind the adulterous woman who was judged by the Pharisees of the days of Jesus, if he has resisted the Truth, having been accused of, and found guilty of falsifying the truth of the Word. True, nobody (neither a human being nor an angel) can condemneth him as per Rom.8:33-34.  But the Word of God would judge and condemn him for the judgment begins at the House of God.

For the purpose of edifying the Body of Christ, God has set "prophets secondarily" in the Body of Christ.  Their duty is to alert the children of God if they deviate from the Word, warning them of divine judgment that begins at the House of God. The prophets are not "accusers" but are defenders of the Word. A servant of God under the New Testament cannot and should not carry on his ministry, ignoring the prophetic warnings or stifling the voice of the Truth through the prophetic ministry which is part of the Body of Christ.  If he deliberately chooses to ignore the trumpet call of the prophets who are required to "cry aloud, spare not, lift up their voice like a trumpet, and declare to His people their transgression...." (Is.58:1), such intransigence would bring about his fall, due to sheer pride.  A warning given by a prophet about certain false doctrine, should not be construed as an accusation against God's elect because it is God who has ordained the prophets as watchmen unto the House of God.  A prophet appointed by God to the Body of Christ should warn with all long-suffering and tears a preacher of the Word who preaches a false doctrine. A prophet is also a defender of the Body of Christ when one member of the Body is defamed publicly through a railing and malicious accusation.

If Martin Luther had not cried aloud nor had lifted up his voice like a trumpet against the unscriptural practices of the Roman catholic Church, then the Church would not have ushered in the epoch making Protestant Movement.  Martin Luther contended for the Truth, though he was branded as an apostate.

No servant of God can claim protection or refuge under the Word of God in Isaiah 54:17, if the charge of falsifying the truth of the glorious gospel is proved against him. Nobody can claim to have the abiding Presence of Christ, the divine Advocate, to defend him if he/she has trampled under his/her foot the holy Word of God.  None can claim to undergo persecution in terms of Matt.5:11-12 (for the sake of Christ), if he/she undergoes suffering due to divine judgment in consequence of certain false doctrine preached by him/her. 

(Job Anbalagan)